Well, I have been pretty much incognito for the past week due to my first attempt at submitting (it was just an attempt to submit for a chance to publish) a paper to a conference. The punchline to the story: I failed to complete the paper in time. It is extremely disappointing to work so hard for something and see it come to no where, vaporize into thin air if you will. I have been working about 14-17 hour days for the past week. It is truly amazing how much we can achieve given the right motivation. I didn’t know I could live reasonably off of so little sleep, although, I will not be making it a habit to get 3 hours of sleep every night. Even though I kept working under such conditions next time I will be better prepared (maybe I can’t say this, one thing I should learn is it never goes how you think) for the amount of work.
It is important to note that I was almost completed the paper. I have now learned and am in the process of sorting out how to handle time management of huge deadlines for the future. Read on for a description of the events.
Summary of Events
I would like to provide a brief description of what happened so everyone can know what I’ve been up to for the last week.
My team and I worked really hard last semester on this research as a class project. When we completed the semester our T.A. and prof suggested that we continue on with the work because they thought it had the potential to get a publication.I was in awe at that suggestion, I couldn’t believe that something I did could be publishable. Now of course that is the goal of going to grad school, but hey, I’m still just a small guy trying to get his first publication.
So essentially what happened was that everyone went their way for break and left the project. When we got back I had emailed the T.A. for suggestions on conferences to aim for. He sent me an email with several upper level ones, and suggested we make an attempt. The only problem with this was that some of the most desirable conferences had due dates in February, and we only had a crude implementation completed, as well as no data or experimentation yet. So off we went frantically trying to collect data an analyze it for the best results.
One thing that happened during this initial phase of work was that we didn’t have an advisor to help guide us. I was basically pushing the research forward with no idea of what to focus on. With this being my first publication attempt I felt really hesitant to move forward. I was unsure of wether we were spending our time on the right stuff and extremely unsure of some assumptions we were making for our research to work. Thankfully about a week ago I finally got some time with my professor and we discussed the project. To be honest that came to nothing, primarily, because we didn’t get the paper written on time, but it was still a huge hurdle. The same day I also met with our T.A., and he provided me with loads of good questions and topics that we should cover. After this confirmation of a direction I became really motivated to get working on the project. I started reading the previous research papers and started to see how our work was really novel. I noticed how the assumptions we were making in our research were the same assumptions that previous works had made, and not only did we have the same assumptions but our research improved on some of them.
As I started to read more of the previous works I really got excited and convinced that we had the “good stuff.” That we were guaranteed a publication. Hmm… no publication without a submission though 
. Nevertheless we charged on with renewed vigor. I was reading and writing our paper while my teammates were writing code to collect the thousands of data observations we would need to be successful.
Time-wise in the story we have gotten to Sunday, and still hadn’t collected any data. The paper was moving along smoothly, but it would hit a wall very soon without results. I incorrectly allowed myself to take time to work on the paper when I should have focused on the data collection code. Well, it turned out that on Monday one of the students became to busy to work on the project and I took the load of writing the code. So I spent several days frantically trying and testing out tons of methods to collect this data. Eventually on Wednesday night I had code it up and running on several machines collecting the data. This was an amazingly Euphoric feeling! I had made it! We were going to succeed because by the next morning we would have the stuff! See the image below for my data collection sweetness. Neat huh?
Well, that feeling faded fast as Thursday afternoon rolled along and we received our first set of results: 4% success rate!!!! I wanted to cry. At this point I really started doubting whether or not we could get done on time, but I pressed onward. I performed some analysis and improved our results to 23%, which was more than enough to push for the submission. The last day (yesterday) was a tumultuous attempt to collect these results and perform additional tests while writing the paper. The code to perform our experiments took a long time to figure out. I didn’t really start writing the final portions of the paper until 5pm, the paper was due at 1:59 a.m..
Throughout the rest of the night I went back and forth asking myself if I should continue to try and get done. I knew very easily that I wouldn’t be submitting my best writing, and that was unnerving. I didn’t really think it was wise to submit a poorly written piece of work. It was extremely frustrating though to have put forth such huge efforts and come up with no submission. At 2 a.m. I finally put the typing away and went to bed.
Lessons Learned
Throughout the process I have learned a lot of new things. I will be parsing these as I go along over the next several weeks, but I thought it would be a great idea to capture some of them right now.
- Time management.
- Results FIRST before you start writing the paper.
- It always takes longer than you expect on a tight schedule. Thus, plan less and start earlier.
- Getting bad results suck.
- Keep pushing even when it looks bad, and importantly when it looks good.
- Knowing when the data you have is enough, and setting a stopping point that will provide enough time to make conclusions and write the paper.
Summing It Up
This week was insane. I learned so much about my abilities to focus and work hard and how failure really sucks. I’m going to provide forthcoming posts that will discuss some of the lessons learned from this past two weeks, as well as some philosophical debate on whether or not one should submit a work that is poor in quality. These are in general more broad grad school questions that deserver their own post. In fact I had intended to place them in this post, but as the length grew I have decided to take them out and give my readers a break!
Oh, and as an astute reader pointed out, not all is lost. I have two more upcoming conferences to submit to, and now I have the right amount of time to get the paper where I really want it.
If you have done research or dealt with deadlines like this, let me know how you handled these types of issues.
